Redirect stderr test (#UN3) fails when cat-ing existing error log file - potential test setup issue

I noticed an issue with the shell project’s stderr redirection test (#UN3). The test assumes a file doesn’t exist when it was just created by previous test steps.

Relevant test logs:

[your-program] $ echo "James says Error" 2>> /tmp/baz/qux.md
[your-program] James says Error
[tester::#UN3] ✓ Received redirected file content

[your-program] $ cat nonexistent 2>> /tmp/baz/qux.md
[your-program] $ ls -1 nonexistent 2>> /tmp/baz/qux.md
[your-program] $ cat /tmp/baz/qux.md
[your-program] cat /tmp/baz/qux.md

[tester::#UN3] Output does not match expected value.
[tester::#UN3] Expected: "cat: nonexistent: No such file or directory"
[tester::#UN3] Received: "cat /tmp/baz/qux.md"

The test attempts to verify error redirection after the file already exists from previous steps. This makes the test unreliable.

Suggested fixes:

  • Clean up test files between assertions
  • Use unique file paths for each test case
  • Verify file existence before assertions

What do you think? Happy to provide more details or help implement a fix.

Hi, thanks for your post!

I’m currently out of the office and will return on Feb 3. I’ll get back to you as soon as possible after I’m back.

Following up on this, but not sure if it has been fixed!

Hey,
I just stumbled on this topic and I’m not sure if I’m reading this correct. The file that doesn’t exist is named: nonexistent and from what I see in the logs you provided doesn’t seem to be created earlier. The test fails because the cat command should display the contents of /tmp/baz/qux.md but instead it just repeats for some reason. From what I’m seeing the issue is with the cat command not behaving as expected.

1 Like

Hey @jwross24, we’ve recently refactored all file creations to go through a single process and added proper logging and cleanup.

Could you confirm if you’re still experiencing the name clash?


It looks like your code is now passing all tests, so I’m unable to reproduce the error in your screenshot.

As noplisu explained above, the expected flow should look like this:

Let me know if this makes sense or if you’d like me to take a closer look!

Closing this thread due to inactivity. If you still need assistance, feel free to reopen or start a new discussion!

This topic was automatically closed 5 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.