Expects a runtime error to return even though it does so

[abdelshafei]

Hey all,

I believe I got a similar error to this months ago, however, this one has been puzzling me for a while now.

Whenever I test my code using the codecrafter CLI i get a “expected runtime error (exit code 70), got exit code -1” when it clearly does return a runtime error

Here are my code snippets:

[main.cpp]

   } else if(command == "run") {
        string file_contents = read_file_contents(argv[2]);

        try { // checks for any unterminated comment blocks
            Scanner scan(file_contents);
        } catch (invalid_argument& err) {
            cerr << err.what();
            return 65;
        }

        Scanner scanner(file_contents);
        if(scanner.getErrStatus())
            return 65;

        Parser parser(scanner.getTokens());
        Interpreter interpreter;

        try {
            interpreter.interpret(parser.parseStmt());
        } catch (runtime_error& err) {
            cerr << err.what();
            return 65;
        }

[Interpreter.cpp]

    } else if(relational == LESS) {

        if(holds_alternative<double>(lValue) && holds_alternative<double>(rValue)) {
            return get<double>(lValue) < get<double>(rValue);
        } else if(holds_alternative<int>(lValue) && holds_alternative<int>(rValue)) {
            return get<int>(lValue) < get<int>(rValue);
        }

        throw runtime_error("Operands must be numbers.");  

Here is the error I am getting:

[tester::#IB5] Running tests for Stage #IB5 (Evaluating Expressions - Runtime Errors: Relational Operators)
[tester::#IB5] [test-1] Running test case: 1
[tester::#IB5] [test-1] Writing contents to ./test.lox:
[tester::#IB5] [test-1.lox] "baz" < true
[tester::#IB5] [test-1] $ ./your_program.sh evaluate test.lox
[your_program] Operands must be numbers.
[tester::#IB5] [test-1] expected runtime error (exit code 70), got exit code -1
[tester::#IB5] [test-1] Test failed

And here is my github repo for this project:

GitHub - abdelshafei/CodeInterpreter: Custom syntax interpreter

If anybody can help me with this, I would greatly appreciate it.

[andy1li]

Hey @abdelshafei, I tried running your code against the previous stages, but it’s actually no longer passing a previous stage #EA6 (Scanning: Lexical errors).

Suggestions:

1. Use our CLI to test against previous stages by running:

codecrafters test --previous

2. Focus on fixing the early stages first, as later stages depend on them.

[andy1li]

Closing this thread due to inactivity. If you still need assistance, feel free to reopen or start a new discussion!