I’ve been trying to understand how git desktop works and here is the issue I am running into. I have been able to install git desktop and codecrafters cli successfully. Now I am running into a single quotes error? This confuses me because when I run the main.py file maually in the terminal, I get the recursive result of "$ ", but the tester is telling me that it is getting back an empty string. Is this a formating error? Is this a bug? Please assist!
Upon further review, it appears my output is coming slower than the tester is testing. Is there a way to disable turbo tests or increase return speed? (Additional note: I think this may be a stack error because as soon as the tester returns an error it starts the next recursion. How would I prioritize the recursion over the tester, so that the tester can read the new output?)
So from what I understand, there appears to be an inconsistency in the tester. Sometimes, the tester will return a fail before the code has a chance to complete. In other words the tester would give a fail before allowing the local main.py a chance to run the next iteration. I think this could be resolve in one of two ways: a.) before connecting to the port set some conditional to check if a method is recursive, so it wait for iteration two before the tester reads the output; or b.) create a match case to reads through the code, checks for recursion, and creates a stack (borrowing this term from magic) that resolves in some order of iteration, compare test result, iteration, compare test result.
I might be missing something, but I’d love to clarify this part:
Sometimes, the tester will return a fail before the code has a chance to complete. In other words the tester would give a fail before allowing the local main.py a chance to run the next iteration
Could you confirm if you’re referring to the following error?
Hi Andy, sorry for the confusion. I had only saw your reply to my other post only after I had made that one. The referenced error is the one I was receiving, and it also makes sense that it would automatically make a new line instead having to specify one manually. Thank you for taking the time to reply to both posts anyways!
